- Diplomacy at the State Level: How California’s Governor Gavin Newsom Shapes Foreign Policy - 17 April, 2025
- Pennsylvania: The Keystone to America’s Political Future - 3 November, 2024
In recent years, U.S. governors have become more than actors of state policy. They’ve emerged as influential diplomats, shaping the contours of foreign policy in unexpected ways. At the forefront of this shift is California’s Governor, Gavin Newsom, who has harnessed California’s economic clout to expand its influence on the global stage. With strategies that include high-profile trade missions, international partnerships, and agreements addressing global issues, Newsom has exemplified how state governments can make meaningful contributions to foreign policy, often independently of, or even at times in contrast to, federal government actions.
California, the fifth-largest economy in the world, holds an economic and cultural sway that makes it a formidable player in global affairs. Newsom recognizes this power, positioning himself not only as a governor but as an ambassador for Californian values and interests, from trade relations to climate laws. In a world where federal foreign policy can often seem inward-focused or volatile, Newsom’s approach is a striking example of state-led economic diplomacy. His actions raise intriguing questions: to what extent can a state like California shape international relations? And how do Newsom’s efforts compare to those of other governors trying to drive economic diplomacy?
Newsom’s Diplomatic Strategy: Expanding California’s Global Presence
Newsom has made a series of bold moves that underscore California’s willingness to forge its path in global diplomacy. His recent diplomatic mission to China, where he met with President Xi Jinping, was emblematic of California’s proactive stance. Officially, the visit was intended to address climate change—a shared interest between California and China. But its subtext was impossible to miss: California is open for business, and it’s willing to engage directly with foreign powers to attract investment and expand trade. Newsom’s meeting with Xi Jinping, a rare opportunity for a U.S. governor, highlights his ability to secure California’s voice in international dialogues that are traditionally reserved for federal representatives. Importantly doing so, without the “antagonistic framing of bilateral relations” that is the norm in Washington.
California has long led in sectors that define global innovation—technology, entertainment, and environmental sustainability. Newsom’s diplomatic strategy taps into these strengths. By building relationships with countries interested in green technology and digital advancements, he aligns California’s economic future with its values. His administration has signed agreements with several nations, including Japan and various European countries, focused on clean energy initiatives. These partnerships are not just symbolic—they’re tied to tangible investments and technology exchanges that benefit California’s economy.
Trade Missions as a Tool of Economic Influence
Newsom’s approach to economic diplomacy is not confined to his high-profile China visit. He has also led trade delegations to nations like Japan and Mexico, where California has strong business interests. These missions are of course carefully designed to appeal to foreign investors by showcasing California’s unique blend of innovation, environmental consciousness, and market access. For instance, during his visit to Japan as Mayor of San Francisco, Newsom emphasized California’s leadership in technology and green energy, sectors where Japanese investors have shown keen interest. These trade missions as well as appearances at conferences, such as the World Economic Forum offered Newsom an opportunity to emphasize California’s openness and resilience, especially important at a time when the U.S. federal government’s foreign policy can appear inconsistent. They represent a walk on a diplomatic tight rope, between brokering agreements that could cement California’s progressive goals, while engaging with regimes that do not share the same beliefs in human rights and Newsom’s progressive agenda.
Trade missions are hardly new, but Newsom has elevated their purpose. In addition to attracting investment, he uses these trips to advocate for shared policy interests—climate action, green tech, and social equity—that resonate internationally. By highlighting these values, Newsom appeals to international leaders and business communities who share these priorities, creating a network of stakeholders that view California as a reliable, progressive partner on the global stage.
California vs. Other States: A Comparative Look
While Newsom’s approach is perhaps the most visible, other U.S. governors are engaging in their own forms of economic diplomacy. Michigan’s Governor Gretchen Whitmer, for example, has focused on trade relationships with Canada, particularly in the automotive sector, which is central to Michigan’s economy. Similarly, Georgia’s Governor Brian Kemp has strengthened ties with Germany and Poland, both key partner in Georgia’s growing manufacturing and logistics sectors. Each of these governors leverages their state’s economic strengths, but the methods and areas of emphasis reveal subtle differences.
Michigan’s focus is pragmatic, centering on existing economic interdependencies. Georgia, on the other hand, has adopted a strategy similar to California’s by attempting to position itself as an attractive location for European manufacturing and logistics. But where Georgia’s diplomacy is largely transactional, Newsom’s has a narrative. He promotes California as a symbol of progressive governance, positioning its values as not only relevant but essential in today’s global economy. This branding element is a distinguishing feature of Newsom’s economic diplomacy—it’s as much about values as it is about business.
Impact on Broader U.S. Foreign Policy
Newsom’s economic diplomacy isn’t just about promoting California; it also has broader implications for U.S. foreign policy. His initiatives provide a counterpoint to federal foreign policy, which under recent administrations has at times not only leaned isolationist, but reinforced the zero-sum pressures in the global system. In reaching out to China, Japan, and other countries, Newsom offers a vision of American leadership that is engaged, collaborative, and grounded in shared values. His actions send a message that while federal policy may ebb and flow, states like California are committed to building lasting international partnerships.
The environmental agreements Newsom has spearheaded are particularly significant. They reinforce California’s commitment to addressing climate change, an area where the state has set aggressive goals, often ahead of federal mandates. By forming partnerships with countries that share these environmental priorities, Newsom positions California as a global leader in climate action. This role can have ripple effects, as international leaders and companies may view California’s policies as a model, which shows that energy transformation and sustainable policy go hand in hand with job creation, ultimately pressuring the federal government to adopt similar standards.
The Future of State-Led Economic Diplomacy
Newsom’s approach suggests that the future of U.S. economic diplomacy may increasingly involve subnational actors. Governors, particularly those of economically powerful states, are well-positioned to act as intermediaries in areas where federal policies may be constrained by partisanship or geopolitical complexities. With California leading the way, it’s conceivable that other states will adopt similar strategies, recognizing that global engagement can be as beneficial locally as it is nationally.
As governors like Newsom continue to assert their presence on the world stage, questions arise about the role of state governments in shaping international relations. Are these efforts an enhancement of U.S. foreign policy or a challenge to the traditional hierarchy? Newsom’s case shows that the answer is likely both. His actions reflect the growing influence of states in global affairs and demonstrate how economic diplomacy can serve as a bridge between state interests and global needs.
In the coming years, we may see more governors following Newsom’s lead, stepping into diplomatic roles that emphasize their state’s economic priorities and values. Whether through climate partnerships, trade delegations, or investment attraction, these leaders are redefining the limits of state power in foreign policy. And in doing so, they’re creating a new model for how American values and economic interests are projected onto the global stage, one state at a time.
Questions for consideration:
What are possible long-term impacts of state-led diplomacy on U.S. international relations?
Could state-led climate diplomacy push the federal government toward more aggressive environmental policies?
How do state-led foreign policy initiatives reflect or deepen political divides between state and federal leadership?
Further readings:
“International Diplomacy.” California Governor’s Office of Business and Economic Development. 2025.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}